Monday, June 17, 2013
Was Obama's Syrian Arms Decision Meaningless?
One of the trite truisms current in international politics is that America and Russia do not agree about Syria. But today at the G8 meeting in Enniskillen, Northern Ireland, the two countries met at the chief executive level to try to find common ground. Russia continues to supply arms to the al-Assad regime and Russian President Vladimir Putin told President Barack Obama on Monday that the United States and Russian positions on Syria do not "coincide." But the two leaders said during the G-8 summit that they have a shared interest in stopping the violence that has ravaged the Middle Eastern country during a two-year-old civil war. Putin also said that both leaders wanted to address the fighting and wanted to secure chemical weapons in the country. The US president said both sides would work to develop talks in Geneva aimed at ending the country's bloody civil war. "We do have differing perspectives on the problem but we share an interest in reducing the violence, securing chemical weapons and ensuring that they're neither used nor are they subject to proliferation," Obama said. "We want to try to resolve the issue through political means if possible." Putin said "of course our opinions do not coincide, but all of us have the intention to stop the violence in Syria and to stop the growth of victims and to solve the situation peacefully, including by bringing the parties to the negotiations table in Geneva. We agreed to push the parties to the negotiations table." Putin said he has not urged Syrian President Bashar al-Assad to leave power, and he remains one of Assad's strongest political and military allies. The White House did not expect any breakthrough with Putin on Syria during the meeting of the G8 Summit at an Irish lakeside golf resort and the meeting further highlighted the rift between the two countries on how to address the fighting in the country. Britain and France feared that any additional introduction of firepower might end up helping anti-democratic extremists linked to Iran and Lebanon's Hezbollah militia. Putin has defended Russia's continuing supply of weapons to al-Assad's military. In an interview with the German daily Frankfurter Allgemeine Runschau published Monday, al-Assad dismissed the Obama administration's contention that the Syrian army used chemical weapons against the rebels. British Prime Minister David Cameron met with Putin on Sunday and later said that the West needs to unite behind a diplomatic push that transitions al-Assad from power. ~~~~~ Dear readers, it appears that we have traded the end of indecision by President Obama about supplying arms to the rebels for another round of international ruminations over the disagreement between Russia and America about the legitimacy of the al-Assad regime. Obama and the West are still not focused on the fundamental problem in Syria - millions of Syrians are being forced into refugee status and almost 100,000 Syrians have been killed in a vicious civil war. Will anyone take the lead in forcefully and rapidly ending this completely unacceptable situation???
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
There are few times in history that there is a real need for a STATESMAN to come forth and end whatever problem seems to be out of each from the major world players.
ReplyDeleteTHIS READERS IS SUCH A TIME. If no one steps forward and act as the mediator between ALL side not just Assad & the free Syrian Army of rebels, there are catastrophic penalties to be paid by not only the Syrian people ...but the entire region of the Middle East.
The Winds of War are blowing in the Middle East and there is a hint of a trap being laid for Israel. This is something that American must be aware of and prepared to assist Israel if an attack is launched on Israel from various directions.
I happen to not see anyone on the horizon that will be "The Peacemaker" or at least lead the entire region to the negotiating table.
This is the time -with all countries either directly or indirectly through associations in the Middle East- to ratchet down the tensions that have existed since the Six Day War.
There are so few options that are available to the West in a (quick) settlement in Syria and the entire Middle East. None of these options really come down on the side of where the US should be. But Obama’s inaction and indecisions have put us into a “No Man’s Land” so to speak.
ReplyDeleteRussia is firmly behind a settlement that is based on Assad staying in power. If that is the end game then tens of thousands more Syrians will parish. Should or could the US ever support such a settlement … NO, but we may have to in the end.
At least 10 of the 17 nations that make up the Middle East are on the rock-solid flank of Syria. With three others being proficient fence sitters, and will in the end settle with the apparent winners. Let’s remember NONE and that includes Israel have any Love for the Obama Administration.
In International Diplomacy and negotiations each side retain some absolute factors that are not accessible under any circumstance. In the first place Obama is not a negotiator on any matter. He tries to force 100% of his wishes. He believes that he is right about everything. A nation must go to the table with some “give away” or risk failing.
Will Obama eventually throw the Syrian people under to reach his settlement. And by Obama I mean him and his State Department experts.
From my view point things look very dim for any settlement or even a cease fire.
Our time to make a difference in Syria was 2 years ago, but the president was busy with a reelection campaign.
ReplyDeleteI don't even know what to believe that comes out of this Administration mouth. It's just one lie after another. A rosy report one day, and revised 2 days later.
Our system is badly and sadly broken, and there is NO ONE in sight to fix it. Something can only be broken so long before it's unrepairable or it looses it's attractiveness to be repaired.
Was Obama's Syrian arms action meaningless ... CERTAINLY IT WAS. It was all spin and trying to take the attention off all HIS scandals. The man is fighting for his place in History, his legacy, maybe even his honor within the Democratic Party.
His interests or energies is not with the citizens of Syria, they are not trying to repair the damage that he has done with Israel, he seems to not care about how Britain, France, or Germany feels about him or lack of leadership.
The US is a boat adrift on the open sea. And we are in great decay because of NO LEADERSHIP.
Tell your stories, play your games, keep fooling us with your no agenda administration. We the People will survive your decadent performances in office.
We have missed the boat in Syria it's sad to say. But we have. Whatever the outcome of the Syrian Civil war will be it will not be of direct response to any initiative the that this American president has put forward.
ReplyDeleteNot one single bit of closure (when or if it comes) to this costly war in human life will be accredited Obama and his actions. because once again Obama has chosen to do NOTHING rather do something that might have failed.
We must realize that this civil war could go on for years and years. Draining the Syrian citizens of a wealth of possible human achievements.
As it has been said here before ... "He (Obama) makes NO decisions rather than risk a bad decision and failure". To equate his actions to an old verse (from someplace) - "It Is Better To have Loved and Lost, Than To Never have Loved At All".
Mr. President the simple act of making an error, a bad decision sets it in print and allows that same error/mistake not to be made by another president down the road. we learn from our mistakes and march onward. To not ever make a mistake is akin to "treading water against a fast moving current" - you will eventually loose and drown. WE ARE DROWNING SIR in nearly every category one wishes to discuss.
To quote a former president (102 years ago) that is not one of my favorites but made a good point for all that followed him in the Oval Office .....
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, and comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows the great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who know neither victory nor defeat".
Exactly right "A Tool 4 Freedom" - it is wrong, an abhorrent wrong to judge a man only by his successes.
ReplyDelete