Wednesday, June 19, 2013

Obama's Unprecedented Afghanistan Faux Pas

Afghanistan President Hamid Karzai said Wednesday he will not enter into peace talks with the Taliban unless the United States steps out of the negotiations. He also insisted the Taliban stop its violent attacks on the ground after it claimed responsibility for a rocket attack that killed four Americans. The Taliban said on Wednesday it was responsible for the attack on the Bagram Air Base in which four American troops were killed. American officials confirmed the base had come under attack by indirect fire - mortar or rocket - and that four US troops were killed. Karzai's strong response and the Taliban attack undercut hopes for the start of talks to end 12 years of war in Afghanistan. All this occurred just one day after the US and the Taliban said they would begin initial meetings in Qatar. Karzai had said Tuesday that he would send his High Peace Council to Qatar for talks but aides said he changed his mind after objecting to the way the announcement was handled, in particular the Taliban's use of its formal name "Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan" in opening an office in Doha. President Barack Obama had cautioned Tuesday that the peace talks with the Taliban would be neither quick nor easy but that their opening a political office in Doha was an "important first step toward reconciliation" between the Islamic militants and the government of Afghanistan. Karzai's High Peace Council had been expected to follow up with its own talks with the Taliban a few days later but it is now unclear whether that will happen. Shafiullah Nooristani, a member of the High Peace Council, told the AP that the use of the name violated agreements Karzai's government had made with the US and caused diplomatic issues for Afghanistan. He said negotiations with the Taliban should not make it seem as if they are a political entity like a parallel institution to the Afghan Embassy which is already there. "The agreement was that the office should open only - and only - for negotiations, not as a political entity," Nooristan said. But as of now, it is not clear that the Taliban will be forced to change the name they are using in Qatar. President Karzai also suspended on Wednesday - to protest the way his government was being left out of initial peace negotiations with the Taliban - talks with the US on a new security deal meant to find ways to end the war. Karzai said negotiations with the US on which American and coalition security forces will remain in the country after 2014 have been put on hold. The two Afghan announcements were issued while Obama was trying to appease Karzai, with Obama telling reporters during a visit to Berlin that "ultimately we're going to need to see Afghans talking to Afghans." "But they've been fighting there for a long time" and mistrust is rampant, Obama said, explaining why he thinks it is important to pursue a parallel track toward reconciliation even as the fighting continues, and it would be up to the Afghan people whether that effort ultimately bears fruit. ~~~~~ It is one thing, dear readers, to lose a war by negotiating away the rights of the side you have been supporting. But it is quite another thing - and perhaps unprecedented - to actually forget to keep in place the public facade of pretending to fight for their rights even as you negotiate them away. It is the latest faux pas in the incompetent foreign affairs record of the Obama administration. It leaves yet another gaping hole in the already-riddled Middle East non-policy of President Obama. One has to wonder how many Obama follies the unstable and agitated region can take before it explodes into a thousand wars in the realization that nobody cares about saving it.

4 comments:

  1. Exactly my point. The Middle East is like a loaded Claymore Land Mine that has been covered over with soil and dirt throughout the eons of time. As this earthen cover gets removed with every diplomatic success and gaffe the firing pin get closer to the surface and being released to explode the bomb.

    This may be a very bad metaphor. But I’m sure you all get my point. We don’t have unlimited tries left to get the Middle East calmed down. They have disregarded logic in Egypt, Iran, Iraq, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Qatar, and Syria in the past few years alone.

    The winds of war are blowing in the Middle East. The terrorist Muslin fanatics are feeling their victories and assuming that the US will always just stand by and do nothing as Obama has shown the world that is our foreign policy.

    ReplyDelete
  2. A wise man or women makes better judgements if he/she knows what they are capable of and what they are not capable of. If one goes into Foreign Policy and has no knowledge or experience their chance for success is very, very slim.

    Obama had NO experience at leadership, domestic or foreign policy, or compromise and negotiations. So why did he or better why did we think he'd be successful at it.

    His expertise is in "community organizing" and playing partisan politics in Chicago. His tenure in the US Senate was all about capturing the democratic presidential nomination and getting elected president.

    I'll bet he was good at that job. He was educated, dealing with people who were of the same culture, he was a stalwart member of their community or so they thought.

    He successfully did this. But nothing in that short tenure gave him ANY CAPABILITIES to match wits with world leaders or religious fanatics on the world stage.

    It's akin to that old saying ... "INSANITY is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results".

    WE are Insane to think that this president will ever get anything right. he enters into every situation unprepared, uninformed, and uncaring of the results.

    HE's President and that's what he wanted to be the first African-American president. he assume that will cement his place in history. Obama doesn't realize we expect so very much more of our president on the world stage and at home

    ReplyDelete
  3. Adab is Middle East is the french Faux Pas and described as refinement, good manners, morals, ethics, decorum, decency, humaneness and righteousness.

    When in Rome you do as the Romans do. When in Afghanistan you do as the Afghans do or expect when your in their land.

    Did Obama live up to that with Karzai? You be the judge

    ReplyDelete
  4. Maybe that is why Obama never got involved in Syria. he was simply never sure what side to come down on. Whereas his side in Afghanistan was picked by Pres. Bush and he inherited it.

    After all choice is easier when it's made for you.

    After all we are trying to make sense (Obama's foreign policy agenda) where there is NO sense or logic. The deciding factor is which day of the week it is.

    ReplyDelete