President Trump GIves AG Barr a Free Hand with Intel for the Russia Hoax Probe, then Departs for Europe to Try to Knock Some Sense into Their Socialist Souls

PRESIDENT TRUMP FREES UP AG BARR TO DECLASSIFY AND USE MATERIALS NEEDED TO SORT OUT THE DEEP STATE RUSSIA HOAX, WHILE PRESIDENT TRUMP TRIES ONCE MORE TO AWAKEN EUROPE TO ITS FAILURES. America wants answers to the Deep State corrupt and seemingly criminal anti-Trump cabal, and the President wants to shake Europe out of its socialist fantasy. • • • PRESIDENT TRUMP GIVES AG BARR WIDE POWERS TO DECLASSIFY. Some efforts to smear and defeat President Trump are easier because most of the classified materials related to the Deep State Russian Hoax cabal have not been released to the public. BUT, President Trump has now counterattacked. Liberty Headlines reported last week that, saying that the Russia Hoax was "an attempted coup or an attempted takedown of the President of the United States," and then declassifying the intelligence materials and giving his Justice Department chief "unfettered access to the country’s deepest foreign intelligence secrets amid an outcry from the spy community and a veiled warning from the US intelligence czar." • The President said Attorney General Bill Barr needed unilateral power to declassify any top secret material to get to the roots of the 2016-2018 investigation into Trump-Russian collusion, a conspiracy theory that has been debunked. AG Barr, said President Trump, “will be able to see how this hoax, how the hoax or witch hunt started, and why it started. It was an attempted coup or an attempted takedown of the President of the United States. It should never ever happen to anybody else, so it’s very important.” • We recall that politicians and former intelligence community leaders say Trump and Barr are threatening to expose the country’s most protected sources of secrets on Russia to mount a political attack on a legitimate investigation that exposed a serious threat to the United States, and we also know how much that reaction is hogwash. Liberty Headlines explains : "The brief order issued late Thursday tells the heads of each of the bodies of the intelligence community, including the CIA and National Security Agency, to support Barr in his review of what he has called suspected improper 'spying' on Trump by the FBI and intelligence bodies. It also gives Barr the power to access and declassify any information he views necessary, which could extend to the top-secret sources of information that intelligence chiefs used to conclude that Russian President Vladimir Putin presided over a concerted effort to sway the election on Trump’s behalf in 2016. The same information led to the investigation of Trump by special counsel Robert Mueller, whose final report in April detailed numerous acts of possible collusion, but concluded none amounted to criminal conspiracy. Critics said Trump and Barr, who has become one of the President’s staunchest defenders, were playing fast and loose with intelligence for political reasons. 'The President has granted sweeping declassification powers to an attorney general who has already shown that he has no problem selectively releasing information in order to mislead the American people,' said Senator Mark Warner, the leading Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee; 'People risk their lives to gather the intelligence material that President Trump and Attorney General Barr are so eager to politicize.'....Former CIA deputy director John McLaughlin called for Congress to thwart the move. 'Giving Barr declassification authority for this investigation is a really bad idea,' he said on Twitter. 'The agencies can cooperate but must retain their legal responsibility for protecting sources.' " • Dan Coats, Director of National Intelligence who oversees the intelligence branches, was clear : "I am confident that the Attorney General will work with the intelligence community in accordance with the long-established standards to protect highly-sensitive classified information that, if publicly released, would put our national security at risk.” • BlabberBuzz quoted Hot Air about the President's declassification : "Will Trump’s declassification order create a chilling effect on the intelligence community....Politico’s Natasha Bertrand suggests people within the Intelligence Community are worried about handing information to Barr which could potentially be declassified against their wishes...." BlabberBuzz suggests that : "Particularly curious to many intelligence veterans and experts is the fact that Barr asked for this new authority from the President, as well as the breadth of the directive. The memo targets not only the FBI...but also the CIA, which is fiercely protective of its sources and methods. In particular, Barr is seeking more information about the foreign sources the FBI used in 2016, according to a New York Times report....this is a probe that Trump’s allies see as a necessary check on government overreach....[and] things are different now. Now we know there was no collusion so this isn’t a distraction anymore because the collusion story is over. Second, we’ve also heard a lot of curious things about how the FBI investigated this case, not to mention a reference to it as an 'insurance policy' in case Trump won the election. Maybe it’s all smoke and no fire....but enough questions have been raised that the American people deserve to know what actually happened here, not just what the IC feels like telling us. You’re certainly not going to have this go away by stopping the investigation....at this point, there’s no turning back." • • • BILL BARR -- ONE TOUGH ATTORNEY GENERAL. It takes a certain self-confidence and knowledge bas to be as open as Attorney General Bill Barr is. For example, in an interview with CBS’s 'This Morning,' AG Barr spoke about FBI special counsel Robert Mueller’s report on his findings in his investigation into Russian meddling during the presidential election and said that the DOJ determined “many of the instances” Mueller found “would not amount to obstruction” as a matter of law. Barr went on : “We didn’t agree with...a lot of the legal analysis in the report. It did not reflect the views of the Department. It was the views of a particular lawyer or lawyers, and so we applied what we thought was the right law. The bottom line was that Bob Mueller identified some episodes. He did not reach a conclusion. He provided both sides of the issue, and his conclusion was he wasn’t exonerating the President, but he wasn’t finding a crime either.” And, Barr again insisted that it is Mueller’s decision to testify before Congress, but he said he does not think the line Mueller drew about sticking to his report is “the proper line.” • AG Barr was also frank when told CBS that the Deep State and Democrats resisting a democratically elected President are “shredding” our institutions. • As we would expect, AG Barr's inter- agency investigation into the origins of the Deep State Russia hoax have hit home with former FBI director Jim Comey, who must know that he is a likely target of the Barr investigation, tweeted : "Bill Barr on CBS offers no facts. An AG should not be echoing conspiracy theories. He should gather facts and show them. That is what Justice is about.”— James Comey (@Comey) June 1, 2019." That is precisely Comey's worry -- that when Barr "gathers the facts," Comey will be in big trouble. • And, as Bill Barr said when CBS interviewer asked him if he was concerned about his reputation in taking the AG job in the Trump administration : "But everyone dies. And I don't believe in the Homeric idea that immortality comes by having odes sung about you over the centuries." Barr explained that he believes "it's important that we do not, in this period of intense partisan feeling, destroy our institutions." When asked if he knew that he would be accused of "protecting the President" when he accepted his role as attorney general, Barr replied that "in a way I did. We live in a crazy hyper-partisan period of time, and I knew it was only going to be for a matter of time if I was behaving responsibly and calling them as I see them and that I'd be attacked. Nowadays people don't care about the narrative or substance. They only care who it helps, who benefits, whether my side benefits or the other side benefits : everything is gauged by politics....Any attorney general in this period is going to lose a lot of political capital, and I realized that. And that's one of the reasons I was ultimately persuaded that maybe I should take it on, because at my stage in life it really doesn't make any difference." • • • WHY IS BARR CONCERNED ABOUT AMERICA'S INSTITUTIONS. Here's one example of the damage being done to them by the Deep State. Gateway Pundit reported on Saturday that : "On May 17th Judge Emmet Sullivan ordered federal prosecutors to release transcripts of the General Michael Flynn’s conversations with Russian officials including transcript to a call made in December 2016 between Flynn and Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak. Judge Sullivan is presiding over former national security advisor Michael Flynn’s case. On Friday federal prosecutors refused to release the transcript of the Flynn-Kislyak phone call. Here is the New York Times version of the situation : "Federal prosecutors rebuffed a judge’s order to release by Friday highly classified transcripts of discussions that Michael T. Flynn, the president’s former national security advisor, had with the Russian ambassador during the presidential transition. The transcripts between Mr. Flynn and Sergey I. Kislyak, formerly Russia’s top diplomat in the United States, were expected to show that they talked in December 2016 about sanctions that the Obama administration had just imposed on Russia…The calls between Mr. Flynn and Mr. Kislyak were referenced repeatedly in court documents and the special counsel’s report on Russian election interference but never released, and prosecutors have not acknowledged the existence of the wiretap. Judge Sullivan, who is overseeing Mr. Flynn’s case, ordered that audio recordings of his conversations with Mr. Kislyak be made public along with a voice mail message made by the President’s lawyer. The Justice Department’s refusal to comply with the judge’s order made clear that prosecutors had no interest in confirming the wiretap, which was approved by the secretive Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court. 'This would be a rare step to make public' such intelligence collection, said Joshua Geltzer, a former Justice Department official. 'What you see in today’s filing is the government trying to avoid disclosing that material.' ” GOT IT?? The Deep State doesn't want to have to admit that President Obama and his FBI were "spying" -- as AG Barr put it in recent congressional testimony -- on the Trump campaign. • Another example of damage being done to American institutions comes from reports about former Vice President Joe Biden. BlabberBuzz published a May 24 article by Aaron Klein of Breitbart that stated : "Former Vice President Joe Biden was reportedly one of the few Obama administration officials who participated in secretive meetings during the early stages of the Obama-era intelligence community’s initial operations regarding suspected Russian interference in the 2016 presidential campaign. That tidbit was contained deep inside a 7,700-plus word Washington Post article published June 23, 2017 in which the newspaper also detailed the highly compartmentalized nature of the original Russia interference investigation and the manner in which other US intelligence agencies were deliberately kept in the dark. Part of the efforts eventually involved unsubstantiated and ultimately discredited charges made by the Christopher Steele dossier that Trump campaign officials were colluding with Russia. Biden’s largely unreported role in the initial Obama administration meetings on the matter of Russian interference could spark further questions now that Attorney General William Barr has appointed a US attorney to investigate the origins of the Russia collusion claims." Klein says AG Barr has noted that the intelligence community’s early handling of the Russia investigation may itself raise questions, saying that it was first handled at a “very senior level” and then by a “small group.” In an interview on Fox News, Barr stated : "The thing that’s interesting about this is that this was handled at a very senior level of these departments. It wasn’t handled in the ordinary way that investigations or counter-intelligence activities are conducted. It was sort of an ad hoc, small group -- and most of these people are no longer with the FBI or the CIA or the other agencies involved. I think there’s a misconception out there that we know a lot about what happened. The fact of the matter is, Bob Mueller did not look at the government’s activities." Klein says : "The lengthy Washington Post article from 2017 detailed the closed circle of Obama administration officials who were involved in overseeing the initial efforts related to the Russia investigation -- a circle than was narrowly widened to include Biden, according to the newspaper report. According to the newspaper, in the summer of 2016, CIA Director John Brennan convened a 'secret task force at CIA headquarters composed of several dozen analysts and officers from the CIA, the NSA and the FBI.' The Post described the unit as so secretive it functioned as a 'sealed compartment' hidden even from the rest of the US intelligence community; a unit whose workers were all made to sign additional non-disclosure forms. The unit reported to top officials, the newspaper documented : They worked exclusively for two groups of 'customers,' officials said. The first was Obama and fewer than 14 senior officials in government. The second was a team of operations specialists at the CIA, NSA and FBI who took direction from the task force on where to aim their subsequent efforts to collect more intelligence on Russia. The number of Obama administration officials who were allowed access to the Russia intelligence was also highly limited, the Post reported. At first only four senior officials were involved, and not Biden. Those officials were CIA Director John Brennan, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, Attorney General Loretta Lynch and then-FBI Director James Comey. Their aides were all barred from attending the initial meetings, The Post stated. The circle of those who attended the secretive meetings on the matter soon widened to include Biden, the Post reported : 'The secrecy extended into the White House. Rice and White House homeland-security advisor Lisa Monaco convened meetings in the Situation Room to weigh the mounting evidence of Russian interference and generate options for how to respond. At first, only four senior security officials were allowed to attend : Brennan, Clapper, Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch and FBI Director James B. Comey. Aides ordinarily allowed entry as 'plus-ones' were barred. Gradually, the circle widened to include Vice President Biden and others. Agendas sent to Cabinet secretaries -- including John F. Kerry at the State Department and Ashton B. Carter at the Pentagon -- arrived in envelopes that subordinates were not supposed to open. Sometimes the agendas were withheld until participants had taken their seats in the Situation Room.' Adding another layer of secrecy, the newspaper reported that when the closed Cabinet sessions on Russia began in the White House Situation Room in August, the video feed from the main room was cut off during the meetings. The feed, which allows only for video and not audio, is usually kept on so that senior aides can see when a meeting takes place. The paper reported : 'The blacked-out screens were seen as an ominous sign among lower-level White House officials who were largely kept in the dark about the Russia deliberations even as they were tasked with generating options for retaliation against Moscow. It was not clear what went on inside those meetings and how many included Biden’s participation. The meetings progressed during the period that the Steele Dossier was reported to the FBI.' " Klein concludes : "Taking to Twitter, Trump wrote : 'The reason that President Obama did NOTHING about Russia after being notified by the CIA of meddling is that he expected Clinton would win...and did not want to ‘rock the boat.’ He didn’t ‘choke,’ he colluded or obstructed, and it did the Dems and Crooked Hillary no good.' " • • • MEANWHILE, PRESIDENT TRUMP IS IN THE UK TRYING TO KNOCK SOME SENSE INTO BRITISH POLITICAL LEADERS. Newsmax reported on Sunday about President Trump's interview with the Sunday Times, published as he arrived in London for a 3-day state visit. The President laid it on the line -- "“They've got to get it done. They have got to get the deal closed.” //// “If they don’t get what they want, I would walk away. If you don’t get a fair deal, you walk away.” //// “If I were them, I wouldn’t pay 50 billion dollars. That is a tremendous number.” • President Trump repeated his backing for the candidates to succeed Prime Minister Theresa May who have said Britain must leave on the due date of October 31 with or without a deal, including former foreign secretary Boris Johnson, whom Trump praised in an interview with the Sun newspaper on Friday, along with former Brexit minister Dominic Raab and interior minister Sajid Javid. BUT, for the British, the real shock must have come when the President said it was a mistake for the Conservatives not to involve Nigel Farage -- the news Brexit Party's leader whose candidates just trounced the Conservative and Labour parties in the European Parliament elections -- in negotiations with Brussels after his success in European Parliament elections last month. President Trump said : "I like Nigel a lot. He has a lot to offer -- he is a very smart person. They won’t bring him in but think how well they would do if they did. They just haven't figured that out yet.” • And, showing his awareness of the issues swirling around Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn, a socialist-marxist who is strongly pro-Palestinian and anti-Semitic. The President said he would have “to know” veteran Corbyn before authorizing US intelligence to share its most sensitive secrets with a hard-left government. That is a warning that no US President has ever given to Britain publicly, but Corbyn is seen even by many members of his own Party as a dangerous politician whose loyalty to democratic values is often questioned. Newsmax says : "If opposition Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn comes to power, Trump said he would have to get to know him before authorizing US intelligence agencies to share sensitive secrets. A Corbyn government must 'get along' with the US if it wants to benefit from the country’s military and intelligence support, he said." • More broadly, President Trump warned British ministers not to jeopardize intelligence-sharing by letting Chinese firm Huawei Technologies Co Ltd into Britain’s new 5G mobile phone network. • British Prime Minister Theresa May is stepping down on June 7 after failing to win parliamentary support for her withdrawal agreement with the EU, whose officials repeatedly say the agreement won’t be renegotiated. The UK government, says Newsmax, "would like to avoid a meeting between Trump and Farage, though the decision rests with the US leader, the Express said, citing a government source it didn’t identify. Farage’s campaign against EU membership was a crucial factor in shifting the political debate in the years before the Brexit vote in 2016." • • • AS USUAL, THE BRITISH AND EUROPEAN MEDIA ARE BITTERLY ANTI-TRUMP. We have to wonder why the President even bothers to try to hold these suicidal Europeans together for democracy. Even the 'conservative' -- in the European sense of the word -- Sky News channel is using an intro video for the presidential state visit that shows the Baby Trump air blimp floating over London with the tagline "He's Back." There are limits -- and the British and European media have long since passed them. • Gatestone Institute's Peter Baum -- a UK-based journalist who is vice chairman of New Fair -- wrote an article on Sunday that captures the animosities around President Trump's visit to Britain and, especially, to Ireland. Baum states : "This week, US President Donald J. Trump will visit the United Kingdom for a state visit and be welcomed by the Queen ahead of the commemorations of the 75th anniversary of the D-Day landings. Many commentators and politicians are not only apoplectic, they are organising various forms of protests. The mainstream media, notably the BBC, are giving continuous coverage to those elements wishing to facilitate, contribute to and participate in the anti-Trump frenzy. The repeated howls of exasperation from these protagonists all center around their perception of Trump's values, which they describe as 'racist.' Irrespective of his record -- in which Trump has reached out to China and North Korea, and initiated economic policies that resulted in record-low minority unemployment -- many, predominately on the political 'left,' remain critical. Paradoxically, there were not such frenzied protests in the UK during the visits there of Xi Jinping of China, Robert Mugabe of Zimbabwe or Bashar Assad of Syria. President Trump is coming over to commemorate the D-Day landings, when thousands of American troops were killed. All people who are working to ensure that the free world remains free will welcome Trump's visit, which is presumably intended to cement even further the exceptional connection between the United Kingdom and the United States. After the his visit to Britain, Trump is scheduled to travel for a two-day visit to the Republic of Ireland to meet with the Taoiseach (Prime Minister), Leo Varadkar and various other Irish parliamentarians. Perhaps President Trump might ask his hosts about the issue of memorials to Nazi collaborators -- such as Frank Ryan, Charlie Kerins, Tom Barry, Sean MacBride and the memorial commemorating Sean Russell in Dublin's Fairview Park, which are still on display throughout Ireland. Given that hundreds of thousands of American troops lost their lives freeing Europe from Nazism, how is it that Ireland finds the audacity to be so contemptuous of the leader of the country of those who paid the ultimate price so that the Irish population could be free to enjoy liberal democracy?" • Baum also gives us a quick review of some of Ireland's history that is generally not talked about in polite company : "Many Irish consider their country as having been neutral during World War II; however, just a little research reveals their behaviour as having been questionable at best. Ireland was one of the first countries to accept the Nazi annexation of Austria during Ireland's sorry history before, during and after the war. Although that history seems to be something they tried to conceal, it has resurfaced once more under the guise of being anti-Israel. Ireland is the only democracy currently authorizing legislation which would criminalise those who purchase or sell goods or services from areas within the only Jewish state in the world. It took Ireland nearly 70 years to apologise for its pre-war anti-Semitism and for the way the country treated some of the approximately 70,000 citizens of Ireland who served in the British armed forces during WWII, only to be treated abhorrently after their return home by their fellow countrymen. Some '5,000 Irish soldiers who deserted their own neutral army to join the war' against the Nazis were, on their return home, denied pensions and not permitted to work for government offices, suppliers or contractors for seven years -- all because they fought against Nazism. If further proof of Ireland's dalliance with WWII Nazism is necessary, it can be easily evidenced not only by the welcome Ireland gave to notorious Nazis but also by the help they gave to wanted Nazi war criminals to escape and the carefree attitude they apparently had toward other Nazis, in permitting them to live quite openly within Irish society. Other facts have emerged which would shock those who thought Ireland was an irrelevance during the fight against Nazism. Jewish children from France were not permitted to come into Ireland in 1943. Oliver Flanagan -- who was promoted to become Minister of Defence in the 1970s' Charles Haughey government and was one of the longest-ever serving members of parliament -- seems to have been the MP mainly responsible for Irish Jew-hatred. Immediately after Hitler's death, Taoiseach (Prime Minister) Éamon de Valera 'called on [German] ambassador Eduard Hempel to express his condolences' on the death of Hitler. In the course of time, such behaviour has been forgotten. President Trump -- as the representative of the Americans fallen, maimed, and the families of veterans, and of those currently serving to maintain Judeo-Christian values in Western democracies -- should be outraged at the ingratitude to such a guest, especially while memorials to Nazi collaborators are still on display throughout Ireland. How would those American servicemen who lost their lives on Omaha Beach to free Europe, feel in the knowledge that one of the countries they fought for were mocking them with memorials to those collaborating with the enemies they fought?" • • • WHY DOES PRESIDENT TRUMP BOTHER WITH EUROPE?? Perhaps because, like many of us who are closely watching current European events, the President foresees the probable collapse of the European Union that harbors many of these anti-Semitic and anti-American agendas. • The Gateway Pundit's Jim Hoft published a guest essay by Ted Malloch on Saturday. Malloch titled his essay "The Demise of the European Project." Ted Malloch, author of "Aspen, Davos and Yale," wrote : "Everyone knows that the precursor to the EU was created with the so-called 'ideal' of unifying the European people after two devastating world wars. It more or less worked as a mechanism for limited economic cooperation until it got greedy and took on zealous imperial political ambitions. But then mass migration, youth unemployment, job precariousness, globalist bureaucracy, and a rise in extreme poverty have shown that project is completely failing. After the Brexit referendum in the UK and the election of populist governments voicing increasing opposition to EU policies in Hungary, Poland, Austria, and Italy, as well as growing nationalist movements in Germany, France, and now Spain and elsewhere, it’s quite clear there is deep and widespread discontent across the EU today. The EU parliamentary election results show nothing less. Europe is fragmented and in utter turmoil." • Malloch states : "The monetary portion of the union was created to coordinate the money supply and interest rates through a central bank in Europe. It put the cart before the horse....a ‘one size fits all’ approach to vastly differing economies and differing fiscal needs. Italy, Greece and Eastern Europe suffered most, failing to meet the unrealistic economic directives and demands imposed by the centralized authorities, more often than not at the behest of wealthier, northern member states.Germany -- whose economic strength is largely predicated on a mercantilist trade surplus with the US -- dominates the EU. German banks invested heavily in southern European countries with interest rates they were unable to pay back. As a consequence, Merkel demanded the countries implement austerity policies with disastrous consequences. German government figures show the country made billions from Greece’s debt crisis. Economic stagnation -- and worse -- followed....the rich became richer, and the poor became poorer....That is what we now know is the Eurozone." • But, adds Malloch : "Then the EU was also created to unify countries with historically distinct national identities. Each European country has its own language, tradition, and way of life...Instead of celebrating the diversity of the many sovereign nations and regions within Europe, the EU sought to create a new kind of diversity by celebrating identities from outside of Europe and demonizing those inside. National patriotism was made into hate speech. In Europe....Italian culture cannot be reduced to a generic 'European' culture, and nor can French, German or Polish culture. Attempts to so homogenize European norms and regulations so that all member states look and act exactly alike do violence to the rich history and individuality of each people and culture -- and deprive Europe and the world of the creativity that lies within these dynamic traditions." • That, according to Malloch, explains the "recent growth of populist movements throughout Europe...a direct result of an instinctive understanding that the fundamental principle of subsidiarity is no longer duly respected or appreciated. A top-down approach to governance, where the smaller is subsumed into or supplanted by the greater, is in fact oppressive and ultimately unsustainable. With the migrant and refugee crisis in 2015, Merkel and Juncker allowed millions of people from outside of Europe to enter indiscriminately. No distinction was made between migrants and refugees at the border. (Does this sound vaguely familiar in our country?) The failure to establish vetting procedures hurt actual refugees the most, as their genuine claims for asylum were not prioritized over migrants without any justification to enter. Criminals and terrorists took full advantage. This open- border policy resulted in a rise in Islamist terrorism in Europe, alongside ethnic and religious tensions between both the new arrivals and the people receiving them. As a consequence, and not surprisingly, anti-mass immigration movements began to rise in Western Europe. Lega in Italy, the Alternative für Deutschland in Germany, the Rassemblement National in France, and now Vox in Spain have all surged. These parties, which previously barely received 5% of the national vote, are now an integral part of parliaments across the continent. Their voting bases are constituted of working and middle-class people, many of whom previously voted for more left wing, socialist parties....Most of these people switched allegiance in large part because of immigration; when they saw their governments take care of foreign needs before their own, and when they were facing unfair competition with cheap labor from abroad. The left-wing parties that previously represented working-class needs focused instead on advancing the interests of a new proletariat of foreigners and an abstract globalist ideology out of touch with reality. On the issue of immigration, the EU continues to actively neglect the needs of Europeans. It is now a supra-national body, which means it takes away the sovereignty of individual nations in order to make decisions for nations as a whole....European citizens....have little to no control over their money, borders, trade or laws." • Further, says Malloch : "The European Commission is weak and its legislative process is unresponsive to people’s needs. Moreover, their President has little experience and few qualifications in being the head of the legislature of 28 European countries and 513 million people. They are not even democratically elected. The next one will evolve through insidious insider backroom bargaining." • Malloch's conclusion? "So, is it unsurprising that the EU’s greatest proponents are polling at record lows, while nationalists like Trump, Modi, Orban, Bolsonaro, Salvini, and Le Pen are confounding their critics with high approval numbers -- in Europe and everywhere. The European Union and its globalist ideology are in tatters. In a recent poll most Europeans said it wouldn’t even exist in fifteen years. Why wait so long?" • • • DEAR READERS, Attorney General Barr will get to the truth in the Russia Hoax cabal against a sitting President, and that will, we all hope, lead to a righting of the American Ship of State. BUT, President Trump's job in Europe is gigantic. The EU and national leaders of its member states are locked onto socialism and globalism and immigration as the way forward. Like American Democrats, European leaders cannot see the destruction ahead if they persist in following their path to a socialist paradise that will soon become a hell on earth. The President will keep trying with the leaders of this death walk, but I suspect that he is really talking to the European citizens who see the folly of the entire EU agenda and are working themselves -- with the democratic tools still available to them -- to beat back the socialist-globalist tide sweeping over them. Bon Chance and Good Luck. America is with you.