Wednesday, April 10, 2013

"The last of the conviction politicians". Maggie would have said,"Nonsense."

"The last of the conviction politicians...". That's what Christiane Amanpour of CNN called Margaret Thatcher in paying her homage Monday. I find the phrase completely dumbfounding. I cannot begin to imagine even the most avaricious or power-hungry politician without conviction - it may have been lost as the political ladder was climbed, but the conviction must have been there in the beginning. Why do politicians fight for or against - taxes, abortions, immigration, freedom of speech, free trade, dog licenses, garbage disposal based on content, military preparedness, the Euro currency - you name it. It is a conviction that the precinct, city, county, state, nation, world will be better for whatever the politician is fighting for or against. Margaret Thatcher had political convictions. So did Ronald Reagan. That's why they co-opted Mikhael Gorbachev, whose conviction that sovietism was right had disappeared. John Boehner and Barack Obama have opposing convictions. That's why they disagree on the future course for America. Even silly and dim-witted politicians have convictions...many of them seem to come from Chicago. But, Christiane Amanpour, you are too intelligent and battle-tested to say something as nonsensical as "..the last of the conviction politicians..." If you had taken time to think, to say what you meant, you would have said that Margaret Thatcher is the most recent example of a politician being courageous enough to act on her convictions - and winning. Because that's the real difference. All politicians act out of conviction, good or bad. But when their convictions sound a deep chord in the hearts of their constituency and when they are determined to make their convictions reality and when they are expert practitioners of the ancient and noble art of politics - the world changes, almost always for the better.

2 comments:

  1. I am not now nor have I ever been a strong believer in ANYTHING that that Christiane Amanpour has ever uttered or will ever utter. She is a progressive liberal that is on the edge of being a socialists - and probably is at heart.

    Ms. Amanpour sees only the side that suites her next broadcast appearance.

    And for her to question another "convictions" is a laugh. What does she use to make that determination ... her own?. Certainly not, she has none.

    According to Webster a conviction is ... "a belief or opinion that is held firmly". Why Ms. Amanpour has never meet an opinion or belief that she wouldn't betray in a split second.

    If she were a smidgin of Prime Minister Thatcher see would understand her error.

    "The trite saying that honesty is the best policy has met with the just criticism that honesty is not policy. The real honest man is honest from conviction of what is right, not from policy".
    Robert E. Lee

    ReplyDelete